Neuropsychological Forensic Evaluations

A forensic or medical-legal evaluation differs from a routine clinical assessment. Forensic evaluations encompass a thorough examination of all relevant legal and medical records, in-depth clinical interviews, the collection of supplementary information, and the administration of neuropsychological and psychological assessments, including specialized forensic assessments. The results of the evaluation are usually communicated to the person who requested it (typically a lawyer), often in the form a detailed report, while the individual being evaluated may or may not have access to the findings.

Forensic neuropsychological evaluations are requested in various civil matters such as Plaintiff and Defense Independent Medical Examinations (IMEs), personal injury litigation, auto and workers' compensation claims, medical malpractice cases, disability determinations, civil capacity evaluations, and fitness for duty evaluations for professional licensing boards. The evaluations can detect feigning and malingering of symptoms, as well as symptom magnification. Dr. Belanger practices in this area, with roughly equal amounts of work for plaintiffs and defendants.

Schedule an Appointment

  • Forensic case consultation can be a valuable tool for providing useful information about a patient or client and for shaping pre-trial strategy. Consultations are often sought to scrutinize the testing results and opinions of other psychologists and neuropsychologists, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses in their reports and conclusions. The specialized knowledge offered helps the referring party to better understand a case before arbitration or a trial, aiding in deposition inquiries and cross-examination.

  • Dr. Belanger is often asked to serve as expert witnesses in legal cases. Using traumatic brain injury as an example, his testimony can address the causative, contributory, or alternative factors related to a client's functioning. He can determine any neuropsychological impairments resulting from accidents or other traumatic events.

    In a trial setting, he can explain the validity of neuropsychological testing as a diagnostic tool and its ability to detect injury and its effects. He can shed light on the potential long-term consequences of brain injuries on a person's daily functioning and quality of life. By contrast, he can determine if an individual's reported symptoms actually caused by other mitigating or unrelated causes